linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib: Fix priority order when generating LUN ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF6-1L5VyZj9kDtjyXDuqrdZcjEoMAxGf4eH9SC3FaVt+c==zQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:31:34 +0100
From:   Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib: Fix priority order when generating LUN ID

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sylvain Munaut
<s.munaut@...tever-company.com> wrote:
> Previously the order described in the comment wasn't the actual
> order that was considered. And the result also depended on the orders
> of the various ID in the pg83 data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

I never got any feedback on this patch. Anything wrong with it ?

It's designed to fix the issue described here FWIW :
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/24/550


Cheers,

   Sylvain Munaut