linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] kvm bug in __rmap_clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:23:29 +0800
From:   "Herongguang (Stephen)" <herongguang.he@...wei.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...driver.com>,
        "Han, Huaitong" <huaitong.han@...el.com>,
        "hangaohuai@...wei.com" <hangaohuai@...wei.com>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "fangying1@...wei.com" <fangying1@...wei.com>,
        "xudong.hao@...ux.intel.com" <xudong.hao@...ux.intel.com>,
        "qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        "wangxinxin.wang@...wei.com" <wangxinxin.wang@...wei.com>,
        "kai.huang@...ux.intel.com" <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com" <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kvm bug in __rmap_clear_dirty during live migration



On 2017/2/22 22:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 22/02/2017 14:31, Chris Friesen wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you reproduce it with kernel 4.8+?  I'm suspecting commmit
>>> 4e59516a12a6 ("kvm: vmx: ensure VMCS is current while enabling PML",
>>> 2016-07-14) to be the fix.
>>
>> I can't easily try with a newer kernel, the software package we're using
>> has kernel patches that would have to be ported.
>>
>> I'm at a conference, don't really have time to set up a pair of test
>> machines from scratch with a custom kernel.
>
> Hopefully Gaohuai and Rongguang can help with this too.
>
> Paolo
>
> .
>
Yes, we are looking into and testing this.

I think this can result in any memory corruption, if VM1 writes its
PML buffer into VM2’s VMCS (since sched_in/sched_out notifier of VM1
is not registered yet), then VM1 is destroyed (hence its PML buffer
is freed back to kernel), after that, VM2 starts migration, so CPU
logs VM2’s dirty GFNS into a freed memory, results in any memory corruption.

As its severity, this commit (http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4e59516a12a6ef6dcb660cb3a3f70c64bd60cfec)
is eligible to back port to kernel stable.