lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e118502c-6be7-2ca5-bd3c-1f390a3961df@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:08:30 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Shaohua Li <shli@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kernel-team@...com, mhocko@...e.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        hughd@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...hat.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 6/6] proc: show MADV_FREE pages info in smaps

On 02/22/2017 10:50 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> @@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
>  		   "Private_Dirty:  %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Referenced:     %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Anonymous:      %8lu kB\n"
> +		   "LazyFree:       %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "AnonHugePages:  %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "ShmemPmdMapped: %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Shared_Hugetlb: %8lu kB\n"

I've been as guily of this in the past as anyone, but are we just going
to keep adding fields to smaps forever?  For the vast, vast, majority of
folks, this will simply waste the 21 bytes * nr_vmas that it costs us to
print "LazyFree:       0 kB\n" over and over.

Should we maybe start a habit of not printing an entry when it's "0 kB"?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ