linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 6/6] proc: show MADV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:08:30 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Shaohua Li <shli@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kernel-team@...com, mhocko@...e.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        hughd@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...hat.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 6/6] proc: show MADV_FREE pages info in smaps

On 02/22/2017 10:50 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> @@ -770,6 +774,7 @@ static int show_smap(struct seq_file *m, void *v, int is_pid)
>  		   "Private_Dirty:  %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Referenced:     %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Anonymous:      %8lu kB\n"
> +		   "LazyFree:       %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "AnonHugePages:  %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "ShmemPmdMapped: %8lu kB\n"
>  		   "Shared_Hugetlb: %8lu kB\n"

I've been as guily of this in the past as anyone, but are we just going
to keep adding fields to smaps forever?  For the vast, vast, majority of
folks, this will simply waste the 21 bytes * nr_vmas that it costs us to
print "LazyFree:       0 kB\n" over and over.

Should we maybe start a habit of not printing an entry when it's "0 kB"?