linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 17/25] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB data sanity check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170224181348.GB2631@localhost>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:13:48 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 17/25] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB data
 sanity check

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 06:55:02PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 06:33:04PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:38:25PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:25 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------
> > > > 
> > > > From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > commit 2d380889215fe20b8523345649dee0579821800c upstream.
> > > > 
> > > > Make sure to check for short transfers to avoid underflow in a loop
> > > > condition when parsing the receive buffer.
> > > > 
> > > > Also fix an off-by-one error in the incomplete sanity check which could
> > > > lead to invalid data being parsed.
> > > 
> > > This appears to *introduce* an off-by-one.  Which is not as serious as
> > > the underflow, but is still a regression.

> > Good catch, thanks! The original loop condition was indeed correct
> > (modulo the missing underflow check), and I'll post a follow-up fix to
> > address this.

> > You should probably not apply this one until after the follow-up is in
> > Linus' tree as this patch breaks TIOCMGET.
> 
> Ok, I'll drop this one from the stable tree now.  Remind me to pick this
> one up when the fixup hits Linus's tree.

Thanks, will do.

Johan