linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI, pciehp: Reuse set_slot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVE=OmKMJR0getueC7QYWP2=JAUQo4MfdCUB=zmFLdFTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2017 10:39:28 -0800
From:   Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:     "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        james puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI, pciehp: Reuse set_slot_off()

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Raj, Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:54:35PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
>> @@ -71,9 +71,6 @@ static void set_slot_off(struct controll
>>                */
>>               msleep(1000);
>>       }
>> -
>> -     pciehp_green_led_off(pslot);
>> -     pciehp_set_attention_status(pslot, 1);
>
> Re using set_slot_off() in remove_board() make sense.. but i'm not sure
> why these are pulled out? It seems to be functionally complete
> when these are done in set_slot_off().

Just don't want to the led operation is wrapped too deep inside.

In board_added(), has led operation code directly for success path.

so put led operation code directly for error path make them more symmetrically.

>
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -126,6 +123,8 @@ static int board_added(struct slot *p_sl
>>
>>  err_exit:
>>       set_slot_off(ctrl, p_slot);
>> +     pciehp_green_led_off(p_slot);
>> +     pciehp_set_attention_status(p_slot, 1);
>>       return retval;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -142,16 +141,7 @@ static int remove_board(struct slot *p_s
>>       if (retval)
>>               return retval;
>>
>> -     if (POWER_CTRL(ctrl)) {
>> -             pciehp_power_off_slot(p_slot);
>> -
>> -             /*
>> -              * After turning power off, we must wait for at least 1 second
>> -              * before taking any action that relies on power having been
>> -              * removed from the slot/adapter.
>> -              */
>> -             msleep(1000);
>> -     }
>> +     set_slot_off(ctrl, p_slot);
>>
>>       /* turn off Green LED */
>>       pciehp_green_led_off(p_slot);
> Don't we need the pciehp_set_attention_status() here?

that attention led could be on if previous power on is not done successfully

Thanks

Yinghai.