[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170224201308.GU2449@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 05:13:08 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
linux@...ck-us.net, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/24] openrisc: entry: Fix delay slot detection
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:32:32AM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 05:32 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > Use execption SR stored in pt_regs for detection, the current SR is not
> > correct as the handler is running after return from exception.
> >
> > Also, The code that checks for a delay slot uses a flag bitmask and then
> > wants to check if the result is not zero. The test it implemented was
> > wrong.
> >
> > Correct it by changing the test to check result against non zero.
>
> This wants to be two patches as you are changing two different things.
Hi Jonas,
Technically yes, two things, but...
The logic is broken without both fixes. It would be a nightmare for someone
to review these one-liners as two patches.
I would like to keep as one.
-Stafford
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S b/arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S
> > index daae2a4..bc65008 100644
> > --- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/entry.S
> > @@ -258,9 +258,9 @@ EXCEPTION_ENTRY(_data_page_fault_handler)
> > #else
> > - l.mfspr r6,r0,SPR_SR // SR
> > + l.lwz r6,PT_SR(r3) // SR
> > l.andi r6,r6,SPR_SR_DSX // check for delay slot exception
> > - l.sfeqi r6,0x1 // exception happened in delay slot
> > + l.sfne r6,r0 // exception happened in delay slot
> > l.bnf 7f
> > l.lwz r6,PT_PC(r3) // address of an offending insn
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists