[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVsO7JP+j1wSy_mM_Rf5S7Hx4Dueco6LD4qcqdDMAjv2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 13:33:23 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: liuxinliang <z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rongrong Zou <zourongrong@...il.com>,
Xinwei Kong <kong.kongxinwei@...ilicon.com>,
Chen Feng <puck.chen@...ilicon.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] drm: kirin: Add a mutex to avoid fb initialization race
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:55 PM, liuxinliang
<z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 2017/2/23 8:56, John Stultz wrote:
>>
>> In some cases I've been seeing a race where two framebuffers
>> would be initialized, as kirin_fbdev_output_poll_changed()
>> might get called quickly in succession, resulting in the fb
>> initialization happening twice. This could cause the system
>
>
> I might understand this race. This because two places call
> drm_helper_hpd_irq_event might cause the race:
> One place is here
> static int kirin_drm_kms_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> ...
> /* force detection after connectors init */
> (void)drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(dev);
> ...
> }
>
> another is the adv7533 interrupt thread handler
> static int adv7511_irq_process(struct adv7511 *adv7511, bool process_hpd)
> {
> ...
> if (process_hpd && irq0 & ADV7511_INT0_HPD && adv7511->bridge.encoder)
> drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(adv7511->connector.dev);
> ...
> }
>
> right?
>
> I don't get a better way to fix this yet , I like to put fb_lock into
> kirin_drm_private.
Ok. I've moved the mutex to the kirin_drm_private structure.
Anything else you'd like to see before I resend?
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists