linux-kernel - Re: gcc7 log2 compile issues in kernel/time/timekeeping.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170225110928.GB1364@x4>
Date:   Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:09:28 +0100
From:   Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gcc7 log2 compile issues in kernel/time/timekeeping.c

On 2017.02.25 at 09:11 +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 25 February 2017 at 08:18, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
> >
> > Why not simply get rid of the ____ilog2_NaN thing altogether?
> >
> 
> That would remove the issue, sure. But we lose an opportunity to spot
> incorrect code at compile time.

In the case of kernel/time/timekeeping.c it is clearly a false positive.
Was ever incorrect code spotted by ____ilog2_NaN in the past?

> My concern is that it by not pushing back on changes to the semantics
> of __builtin_constant_p() such as this one, we may start seeing other
> issues where we can no longer use it, and we lose a very useful tool.

We had a long discussion in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
As you can see there is no real consensus.
But ilog2 seems to be the only place where this ever popped up.
(There were several distro-wide mass rebuilds with gcc-7 and no other
__builtin_constant_p() issue was found yet.)

-- 
Markus