linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the f2fs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30396.1488184068@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:27:48 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, DongOh Shin <doscode.kr@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the f2fs tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> ++int f2fs_getattr(const struct path *path, struct kstat *stat, u32 request_mask,
> ++		 unsigned int query_flags);

This looks correct.  I see someone replaced all the function declarations with
ones with named arguments, hence the collision.

David