lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:25:14 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] arm64: allwinner: Kconfig: add essential pinctrl
 driver for H5

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 09:19:50AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> H5 SoC has two pin controllers, one (in user manual called "CPUx") needs
> a slightly advanced driver, and the other (called "CPUs") is just equal
> to the on in H3, and the H3 driver can be just reused.
> 
> Select the two necessary pinctrl drivers when building kernel for
> Allwinner SoCs.
> 
> Also add H5 in the option's description.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 129cc5ae4091..81f0d6149c2e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -5,8 +5,11 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>  	select PINCTRL
>  	select PINCTRL_SUN50I_A64
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN50I_H5
> +	select PINCTRL_SUN8I_H3_R

Why not add those options as def_bool instead?

Being able to remove them certainly have values if you want to strip
them down.

>  	help
> -	  This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64.
> +	  This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64
> +	  and H5.

There's no point in having an ever growing list of SoCs here. You can
just remove the mention of the A64.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ