linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: MIPS: remove useless kvm_request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed32cd02-8aeb-cd4a-f25a-c20deb152425@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:03:51 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: MIPS: remove useless kvm_request_clear

Am 27.02.2017 um 09:45 schrieb Andrew Jones:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:50:01PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
>> index 552ae2b5e911..70614ca41744 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/kvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -865,7 +865,6 @@ enum emulation_result kvm_mips_emul_wait(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  		 * check if any I/O interrupts are pending.
>>  		 */
>>  		if (kvm_request_test_and_clear(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu)) {
>> -			__kvm_request_clear(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
>>  			vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_IRQ_WINDOW_OPEN;
>>  		}
> 
> should remove the {} too.
> 

With that,

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David