linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/mm: handle memmap kernel option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170227084808.GA31271@remoulade>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:48:09 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, dongbo4@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/mm: handle memmap kernel option

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:48:50AM +0800, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> On 2017/2/26 18:46, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On 25 February 2017 at 06:47, Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com> wrote:

> >> To make user reserve memory for some specific use more convenient,
> >> this patch implement the following memmap variants:
> >>  - memmap=nn[KMG]$ss[KMG]: mark specified memory as reserved;
> >>  - memmap=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]: force usage of a specific region of memory;

> > Could you explain which problem you are solving here? ACPI implies
> > UEFI on arm64, and so these reservations could be made by a boot
> > component instead, if it requires a fixed memory reservation. If this
> > is a reservation for, e.g., OP-TEE, we should not rely on the command
> > line to communicate this information.
> > 
> We just want to reserve some memory for a driver and I just not so familiar
> with how to reserve memory with UEFI. So doubt about whether it is suitable
> to reserve memory with cmdline like "memmap=xxx", which had appeared in x86
> for a long time.

Could you please explain for what purpose this is necessary?

Does the driver need a specific region of memory? Or just some contiguous
region? Or something else?

For the former, this is not an appropriate solution; firmware must absolutely
mark the memory as reserved for a particular purpose.

If you just need contiguous physical memory, I believe it would be better to
use CMA, and request CMA reserve a larger area if necessary.

Thanks,
Mark.