[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170227162639.GN21809@atomide.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:26:39 -0800
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ruslan Ruslichenko <rruslich@...co.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...inux.com, Sean Young <sean@...s.org>,
wfg@...ux.intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [WARNING: A/V UNSCANNABLE][Merge tag 'media/v4.11-1' of git]
ff58d005cd: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0000039c
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> [170227 08:20]:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> [170227 07:44]:
> > > Because it's not the requirement that hurts primarily, but the resulting
> > > non-determinism and the sporadic crashes. Which can be solved by making the race
> > > deterministic via the debug facility.
> > >
> > > If the IRQ handler crashed the moment it was first written by the driver author
> > > we'd never see these problems.
> >
> > Just in case this is PM related.. Maybe the spurious interrupt is pending
> > from earlier? This could be caused by glitches on the lines with runtime PM,
> > or a pending interrupt during suspend/resume. In that case IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY
> > might provide more clues if the problem goes away.
>
> It's not PM related. That's just silly hardware. At the moment when you
> enable some magic bit in the control register, which is required to probe
> the version, the fricking thing spits out a spurious interrupt despite the
> interrupt enable bit in the same control register being still disabled. Of
> course we cannot install an interrupt handler before having probed the
> version and setup other stuff, except we add magic 'if (!initialized)'
> crappola into the handler and lose the ability to install version dependent
> handlers afterwards.
OK and presumably no -EPROBE_DEFER happening either.
> Wonderful crap that, isn't it?
Sounds broken..
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists