linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bmtnrdvb.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:56:40 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> writes:

> Em Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 07:23:38PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
>> With ABIv2, we offset 8 bytes into a function to get at the local entry
>> point.
>
> So, I think I can carry the first one via Ingo, etc, what about this
> one?
>
> Is it ok for me to process it?

Yes please.

> Seems simple enough, has been thru a lot of discussion, but would be
> better if it was Reviewed-by the PPC maintainers or else just processed
> by them.
>
> Please advise,

I think it's best if you take it with patch 1. I realise they could go
separately, but they make more sense together I think.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>

cheers