[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <93219edf-0f6d-5cc7-309c-c998f16fe7ac@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:18:54 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Zhigang Lu <zlu@...hip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: align jump_entry table to at least 4-bytes
On 02/27/2017 01:57 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 10:49 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
>> The core jump_label code makes use of the 2 lower bits of the
>> static_key::[type|entries|next] field. Thus, ensure that the jump_entry
>> table is at least 4-byte aligned.
>>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> b/arch/mips/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> index e77672539e8e..243791f3ae71 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/jump_label.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static __always_inline bool
>> arch_static_branch(struct static_key *key, bool bran
>> asm_volatile_goto("1:\t" NOP_INSN "\n\t"
>> "nop\n\t"
>> ".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
>> + ".balign 4\n\t"
>> WORD_INSN " 1b, %l[l_yes], %0\n\t"
>> ".popsection\n\t"
>> : : "i" (&((char *)key)[branch]) : : l_yes);
>> @@ -45,6 +46,7 @@ static __always_inline bool
>> arch_static_branch_jump(struct static_key *key, bool
>> asm_volatile_goto("1:\tj %l[l_yes]\n\t"
>> "nop\n\t"
>> ".pushsection __jump_table, \"aw\"\n\t"
>> + ".balign 4\n\t"
>> WORD_INSN " 1b, %l[l_yes], %0\n\t"
>> ".popsection\n\t"
>> : : "i" (&((char *)key)[branch]) : : l_yes);
>
>
> I will speak only for the MIPS part.
>
> If the section is not already properly aligned, this change will add
> padding, which is probably not what we want.
>
> Have you ever seen a problem with misalignment in the real world?
>
Hi,
Yes, there was a WARN_ON() reported on POWER here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/19/85
The WARN_ON() triggers if either of the 2 lsb are set. More
specifically, its coming from 'static_key_set_entries()' from the
following patch, which was recently added to linux-next:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/3/558
So this was not seen on mips, but I included all arches in this patch
that I though might be affected.
> If so, I think a better approach might be to set properties on the
> __jump_table section to force the proper alignment, or do something in
> the linker script.
>
So in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h, we are already setting
'ALIGN(8)', but that does not appear to be sufficient for POWER...
Also, I checked the size of the vmlinux generated after this change on
all 4 arches, and it was rather minimal. I think POWER increased the
most, but the other arches increased by only a few bytes.
Thanks,
-Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists