linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/3] drivers: Add an API to read device specific config data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:41:52 +0100
From:   Alban <albeu@...e.fr>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Aban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] drivers: Add an API to read device specific config
 data

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:42:30 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:

> +Moritz
> 
> Hi Alban,
> 
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:28:09 +0100
> Alban <albeu@...e.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > while looking at adding OF support for the ath9k driver I had the problem of
> > reading the EEPROM data. On the SoC platforms this data is stored in an SPI
> > flash along with a few other things. In OpenWRT/LEDE this data is read from
> > the board init code using the fact that the flash is (normaly) readable from
> > a memory map. A bit too hackish for my taste.
> > 
> > This is just one example, there is various other similar cases, mostly with
> > MAC addresses. I thought it would be nicer if we had a clean API for this,
> > similar to the firmware API but per device instance instead of beeing per
> > driver. The device driver wouldn't have to care where the data is stored,
> > they just request it and the backend take care of reading the EEPROM, MTD
> > or whatever is used on the board.
> > 
> > This series implement such an API along with an implementation for MTD
> > devices and a use in the ath9k driver. As this is an RFC I didn't yet
> > write the OF binding documentation, that will come later if the feedback
> > is positive.  
> 
> What you're looking for already exists and it's called nvmem[1]. Some
> work has been done to expose MTD partitions as nvmem cells [2], but
> it's never been finished.
> Can you please finish Moritz implementation instead of creating a new
> API?

I didn't knew about the nvmem API :/ I'll look into finishing the MTD
support then.

Alban

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped