[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228065306.GH22938@uranus>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:53:06 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...uxfoundation.org, xemul@...tuozzo.com,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, kir@...nvz.org, luto@...capital.net,
jbaron@...mai.com, Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] kcmp: Add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target
files
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 02:43:47PM -0800, Andrei Vagin wrote:
...
> > +
> > + if (filp1 && filp_epoll) {
> > + filp_tgt = get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(filp_epoll, slot.tfd, slot.toff);
> > + if (IS_ERR(filp_tgt))
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(filp_tgt);
> > + else
> > + ret = kcmp_ptr(filp1, filp_tgt, KCMP_EPOLL_TFD);
>
> I think KCMP_FILE has to be used here ^^^^, because we compare files. We
> have to use the same function for all files to be able to sort them, don't we?
Yes. I already have v2 in my queue. Strictly speaking we can use separate
salt here but it will be waste of memory from userspace POV. I didn't send
v2 yet since I'm modifying criu still to test overall picture. Hopefully
will send today.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists