lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAfSe-v6O5k57T1zjZ+GM5PsWLLqXP3QdmJvsGPGPeZH7mHLiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:08:53 +0800
From:   Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Orson Zhai(翟京) <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] arm64: dts: Add basic DT to support Spreadtrum's SP9860G

On 24 February 2017 at 23:07, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Chunyan Zhang
> <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com> wrote:
>> On 四,  2月 23, 2017 at 06:00:20下午 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Chunyan Zhang
>>> <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com> wrote:
>>> > From: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>
>>> >
>>> > SC9860G is a 8 cores of A53 SoC with 4G LTE support SoC from Spreadtrum.
>>> >
>>> > According to regular hierarchy of sprd dts, whale2.dtsi contains SoC
>>> > peripherals IP nodes, sc9860.dtsi contains stuff related to ARM core stuff
>>> > and sp9860g dts is for the board level.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>
>>> > ---
>>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile         |   3 +-
>>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9860.dtsi      | 531 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sp9860g-1h10.dts |  56 ++++
>>> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/whale2.dtsi      |  70 ++++
>>> >  4 files changed, 659 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9860.dtsi
>>> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sp9860g-1h10.dts
>>> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/whale2.dtsi
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile
>>> > index b658c5e..f0535e6 100644
>>> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile
>>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/Makefile
>>> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>> > -dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SPRD) += sc9836-openphone.dtb
>>> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SPRD) += sc9836-openphone.dtb \
>>> > +                       sp9860g-1h10.dtb
>>> >
>>> >  always         := $(dtb-y)
>>> >  subdir-y       := $(dts-dirs)
>>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9860.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9860.dtsi
>>> > new file mode 100644
>>> > index 0000000..73deb4e
>>> > --- /dev/null
>>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/sprd/sc9860.dtsi
>>> > @@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
>>> > +/*
>>> > + * Spreadtrum SP9860 SoC DTS file
>>> > + *
>>> > + * Copyright (C) 2016, Spreadtrum Communications Inc.
>>> > + *
>>> > + * This file is licensed under a dual GPLv2 or X11 license.
>>>
>>> Please use SPDX-License-Identifier tag instead.
>>>
>>
>> Just to double check, if I use it like:
>>
>> SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or X11)
>>
>> Is this what you mean?
>
> Yes. However, X11 is not actually correct (pretty much all dts files
> have it wrong). This is the X11 license[1] which is explicitly for the
> X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. While the MIT
> license[2] is the text that most dts files actually use (while also
> stating X11 license). It's obvious that everyone just copies and
> pastes the license and has not consulted their lawyers.

OK, got it.

>
>> Will this file still be licensed under the same terms it was, right?
>
> Consult your lawyer. :)
>
> [...]
>
>>> > +               ext_26m: ext-26m {
>>>
>>> This should be at the top-level. It is not part of the bus.
>>
>> This clock node is in 'soc' node, not under 'ap-apb'.  Since there're other
>> clocks on SC9860 which would have 'reg' property, we thought this fixed
>> clock would be better under 'soc' with other clocks.
>
> But the clock is part of the board, not the soc. Or to put it another
> way, it's not related to anything else, so it shouldn't be a child of
> anything.

Ok, I will move it to the top-level.

Thanks,
Chunyan

>
> Rob
>
> [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ