lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:56:39 +0200
From:   Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ep0: Fix the possible missed request for handling delay STATUS phase


Hi,

Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> writes:
>> So I am not sure how the Gadget driver can figure out that it needs to
>> usb_ep_queue() another request for status stage when handling the
>> no-data control?
>
> Gadget drivers already queue status-stage requests for no-data
> control-OUT requests.  The difficulty comes when you want to handle an
> IN request or an OUT request with a data stage.

I don't see a difficulty there. Gadget driver will see wLength and
notice it needs both data and status stages, then it does:

usb_ep_queue(ep0, data_req, GFP_KERNEL);
usb_ep_queue(ep0, status_req, GFP_KERNEL);

Just needs to prepare both requests and queue them both ahead of
time. UDC drivers should hold both requests in their own private list
and process one at a time.

-- 
balbi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ