[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tw7ettoo.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:56:39 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: ep0: Fix the possible missed request for handling delay STATUS phase
Hi,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> writes:
>> So I am not sure how the Gadget driver can figure out that it needs to
>> usb_ep_queue() another request for status stage when handling the
>> no-data control?
>
> Gadget drivers already queue status-stage requests for no-data
> control-OUT requests. The difficulty comes when you want to handle an
> IN request or an OUT request with a data stage.
I don't see a difficulty there. Gadget driver will see wLength and
notice it needs both data and status stages, then it does:
usb_ep_queue(ep0, data_req, GFP_KERNEL);
usb_ep_queue(ep0, status_req, GFP_KERNEL);
Just needs to prepare both requests and queue them both ahead of
time. UDC drivers should hold both requests in their own private list
and process one at a time.
--
balbi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists