[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228124507.GG5680@worktop>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:45:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, kirill@...temov.name,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
npiggin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/13] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:17:32PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> + /*
> + * struct held_lock does not have an indicator whether in nmi.
> + */
> + int nmi;
Do we really need this? Lockdep doesn't really know about NMI context,
so its weird to now partially introduce it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists