[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170227232328.GA1604@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:23:28 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Crash in -next due to 'objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and
other dead ends'
Hi Josh,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:21:14PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59:23PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my qemu tests for mips64 in -next fail as follows.
> >
> > ...
> > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) on device 8:0.
> > Freeing unused kernel memory: 304K
> > This architecture does not have kernel memory protection.
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000a
> >
> > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000a
> >
> > There is no symbol traceback, and I don't see any other (obvious) error
> > message. bisect points to commit 'objtool: Improve detection of BUG()
> > and other dead ends'; reverting that patch fixes the problem.
> > Bisect log is attached below.
> >
> > The script used to run the test as well as the root file system is available
> > at https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/tree/master/rootfs/mips64
> >
> > A complete log is available at
> > http://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-mips64-next/builds/592/steps/qemubuildcommand/logs/stdio
>
> Hi Guenter,
>
> This failure doesn't make much sense. Objtool (and the reported bad
> patch) are x86-only and should have nothing to do with mips64. Would it
> be possible for you to double check the error?
>
I already did; after all, bisect points to the patch, and reverting it fixes
the problem. After looking into the patch, I concluded that the following
might help.
-#define unreachable() annotate_unreachable(); __builtin_unreachable()
+#define unreachable() do { annotate_unreachable(); __builtin_unreachable(); } while (0)
and it does ...
> Otherwise I could try to recreate. Do you have a recommendation for a
> mips cross-compiler? (preferably something that's already built and that
> might work on Fedora)
>
I use gcc 4.9.0 from
https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.9.0/
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists