lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228152811.vwn5koz3jhweeo7o@judith.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:28:11 +0100
From:   Natale Patriciello <natale.patriciello@...il.com>
To:     user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: UML not maintained anymore?

It seems there is no interest in fixing bugs (such as [1]). Moreover,
same guest filesystem (same host os, distribution, etc.) on two
different machines (i7-2630 the first, i7-7700HQ the second) yield
different results, with crashes and corruption of filesystem in the
modern computer.  So, can I consider UML as a legacy thing in the Linux
kernel? With what I can replace it (I'm doing TCP research, and I focus
on the networking stack)?

Thank you

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/user-mode-linux/mailman/message/35663374/ 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ