[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bca96944-bd58-5011-5eb9-01c4a1440fe2@elopez.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 14:01:48 -0300
From: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>
To: plaes@...es.org
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 3/4] ARM: sun7i: Convert to CCU
Hi,
I spotted a couple of things here on a quick look, see below
El 27/02/17 a las 18:09, Priit Laes escribió:
> Convert sun7i-a20.dtsi to new CCU driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi | 719 +++++----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 633 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
> index 04c9977..6f80cb8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20.dtsi
> @@ -47,7 +47,8 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h>
>
> -#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun4i-a10-pll2.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/sun7i-ccu.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/sun7i-ccu.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/dma/sun4i-a10.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/sun4i-a10.h>
>
> @@ -67,19 +68,19 @@
> compatible = "allwinner,simple-framebuffer",
> "simple-framebuffer";
> allwinner,pipeline = "de_be0-lcd0-hdmi";
> - clocks = <&ahb_gates 36>, <&ahb_gates 43>,
> - <&ahb_gates 44>, <&de_be0_clk>,
> - <&tcon0_ch1_clk>, <&dram_gates 26>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_AHB_LCD0>, <&ccu CLK_AHB_HDMI1>,
> + <&ccu CLK_AHB_DE_BE0>, <&ccu CLK_DE_BE0>,
> + <&ccu CLK_TCON0_CH1>, <&ccu CLK_DRAM_DE_BE0>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> - framebuffer@1 {
> + framebuffer@0 {
This looks like an unrelated change
> @@ -184,21 +185,11 @@
>
> osc24M: clk@...20050 {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> - compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-osc-clk";
> - reg = <0x01c20050 0x4>;
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> clock-output-names = "osc24M";
> };
allwinner,sun4i-a10-osc-clk implements a gate apart from a fixed clock,
is the feature loss intended?
Cheers,
Emilio
Powered by blists - more mailing lists