linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] staging: ks7010: fixed warning of avoiding line over 80 characters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170228192619.GB22709@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2017 20:26:19 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Chetan Sethi <cpsethi369@...il.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, punitvara@...il.com, wsa@...-dreams.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shiva@...ev.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] staging: ks7010: fixed warning of avoiding line
 over 80 characters

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:59:36AM +0900, Chetan Sethi wrote:
> This patch fixes warning of line over 80 characters, as issued by
> checkpatch.pl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chetan Sethi <cpsethi369@...il.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - split multiple changes across different patches
> v3:
>  - mentioned patch revision in subject
> v4:
>  - modified description to exclude mention of patch number from changelog
> v5:
>  - updated series for removing additional checkpatch error introduced
> 
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> index 9ab80e1..668202d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h
> @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  
> -#include <linux/spinlock.h>	/* spinlock_t                                   */
> -#include <linux/sched.h>	/* wait_queue_head_t                            */
> -#include <linux/types.h>	/* pid_t                                        */
> -#include <linux/netdevice.h>	/* struct net_device_stats,  struct sk_buff     */
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>	/* spinlock_t */
> +#include <linux/sched.h>	/* wait_queue_head_t */
> +#include <linux/types.h>	/* pid_t */
> +#include <linux/netdevice.h>	/* struct net_device_stats,  struct sk_buff */
>  #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/wireless.h>
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>	/* struct atomic_t */
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@
>  
>  #ifdef KS_WLAN_DEBUG
>  #define DPRINTK(n, fmt, args...) \
> -                 if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: "fmt, __FUNCTION__, ## args)
> +                 if (KS_WLAN_DEBUG > (n)) \

Why did you not use a tab here to indent this line as you were modifying
it?

thanks,

greg k-h