[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170228185455.mdmvuc232chlveve@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:54:55 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: allocate spi_board_info entries one by one
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:24:17AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:16:50AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 08:18:56PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Lists of spi_board_info entries registered with spi_register_board_info()
> > > can be quite long; instead of forcing memory allocator find contagious
> > Do you have numbers on that?
> Hm, so the largest array seems to be in
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf537/boards/stamp.c at max of 43 entries. The new
> board info is ether 60 or 72 bytes, so we get 2 or 3K table. Not above
> page, but still could be packed I think.
Oh wow, that's impressively large. Still not sure the optimization is
particularly worth it though, it's small change in the grand scheme of
things. OTOH it's a small change.
> If we decide that we want to keep single chunk I'll just change the
> allocation to kcalloc. Let me know.
I'd be inclined to do that because it requires less thinking about the
value of what should be a very small optimization either way but
whatever :)
> We should probably redo patch #1 to avoid allocating empty property sets
> anyway.
Yeah.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists