[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3-JwLcQCgfBse0qzHtJcwmOZ9DqLs4B0DjFM45HEYcgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:48:27 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] watchdog: wm831x watchdog really needs mfd
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
>>> config WM831X_WATCHDOG
>>> tristate "WM831x watchdog"
>>> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
>>> + depends on MFD_WM831X
>>
>> I prefer the fix proposed by Randy:
>>
>> - depends on MFD_WM831X || COMPILE_TEST
>> + depends on MFD_WM831X || (MFD_WM831X=y && COMPILE_TEST)
>>
>
> Agreed, that's better.
Actually I misread. They should be completely equivalent, the part after
the || has no effect here.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists