[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58638497-6660-6119-e24d-d2a8b05d99b0@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:22:05 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] x86/xen: start untangling PV and PVHVM
guest support code
On 24/02/17 17:14, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Introduce CONFIG_XEN_PV config option and split enlighten.c into
> 4 files. Temporary add #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV to smp.c and mmu.c to
> not break the build and not make the patch even bigger.
>
> xen_cpu_up_prepare*/xen_cpu_die hooks require separation to support
> future xen_smp_intr_init() split.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Could you please split pure code movement and functional changes into
different patches? This would make review much easier.
So 1 patch to split up enlightenment.c and at least one patch for the
rest of the changes (Kconfig, splitting of x86_hyper_xen, ...).
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists