[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-9dcfe2c75b51f454f39c2de4756e841228865b47@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:50 -0800
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: elena.reshetova@...el.com, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:locking/urgent] locking/refcounts: Change WARN() to
WARN_ONCE()
Commit-ID: 9dcfe2c75b51f454f39c2de4756e841228865b47
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/9dcfe2c75b51f454f39c2de4756e841228865b47
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:25:55 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 09:25:55 +0100
locking/refcounts: Change WARN() to WARN_ONCE()
Linus noticed that the new refcount.h APIs used WARN(), which would turn
into a dmesg DoS if it triggers frequently on some buggy driver.
So make sure we only warn once. These warnings are never supposed to happen,
so it's typically not a problem to lose subsequent warnings.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzbYUTZ=oqZ2YgDjY0C2_n6ODhTfqj6V+m5xWmDxsuB0w@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
lib/refcount.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/refcount.c b/lib/refcount.c
index 1d33366..aa09ad3 100644
--- a/lib/refcount.c
+++ b/lib/refcount.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
val = old;
}
- WARN(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
return true;
}
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_add_not_zero);
void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
{
- WARN(!refcount_add_not_zero(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(!refcount_add_not_zero(i, r), "refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_add);
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r)
val = old;
}
- WARN(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(new == UINT_MAX, "refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.\n");
return true;
}
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_inc_not_zero);
*/
void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
{
- WARN(!refcount_inc_not_zero(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(!refcount_inc_not_zero(r), "refcount_t: increment on 0; use-after-free.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_inc);
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
new = val - i;
if (new > val) {
- WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
return false;
}
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_dec_and_test);
void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
{
- WARN(refcount_dec_and_test(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(refcount_dec_and_test(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(refcount_dec);
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
new = val - 1;
if (new > val) {
- WARN(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
+ WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
return true;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists