linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] x86/xen: start untangling PV and PVHVM guest support code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:38:49 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] x86/xen: start untangling PV and PVHVM guest support code

Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> writes:

> On 24/02/17 17:14, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Introduce CONFIG_XEN_PV config option and split enlighten.c into
>> 4 files. Temporary add #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_PV to smp.c and mmu.c to
>> not break the build and not make the patch even bigger.
>> 
>> xen_cpu_up_prepare*/xen_cpu_die hooks require separation to support
>> future xen_smp_intr_init() split.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
>
> Could you please split pure code movement and functional changes into
> different patches? This would make review much easier.
>

It's a bit hard with this series to make patches smaller and not break
the build ... :-(

> So 1 patch to split up enlightenment.c and at least one patch for the
> rest of the changes (Kconfig, splitting of x86_hyper_xen, ...).

This sounds doable, I'll try!

-- 
  Vitaly