[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170301140833.GG6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:08:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] perf annotate: Introduce the new source code view
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:58:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:59:52AM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
> > The current source code view using 'objdump -S'
> > has several limitations regarding line numbers of each soure
> > code line and confusing mixed soure code & diassembly view.
> >
> > So not use the '-S' option any more and
> > add the new reable source code view with
> > correct line numbers and source code per each symbol(function)
> > using new struct source_code.
>
> I like this "source-only" annotation, but some people still might want
> to see the "mixed" annotation. So I think you need to keep it and
> provide another option for the source-only mode. And then we can
> change the default later.
What's the point of source-only? You can't even see what it is that is
expensive.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists