[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170301151432.GD11730@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:14:32 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] mm: remove unnecessary reclaimability check from
NUMA balancing target
On Tue 28-02-17 16:40:02, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> NUMA balancing already checks the watermarks of the target node to
> decide whether it's a suitable balancing target. Whether the node is
> reclaimable or not is irrelevant when we don't intend to reclaim.
I guess the original intention was to skip nodes which are under strong
memory pressure but I agree that this is questionable heuristic.
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 2c63ac06791b..45a18be27b1a 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1718,9 +1718,6 @@ static bool migrate_balanced_pgdat(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> {
> int z;
>
> - if (!pgdat_reclaimable(pgdat))
> - return false;
> -
> for (z = pgdat->nr_zones - 1; z >= 0; z--) {
> struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + z;
>
> --
> 2.11.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists