[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170301214120.GA30451@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:41:20 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>,
Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
Stephen Bates <stephen.bates@...rosemi.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] New Microsemi PCI Switch Management Driver
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:53:13PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Changes since v4:
>
> * Turns out pushing the pci release code into the device release
> function didn't work as I would have liked. If you try to unbind the
> device with an instance open, then you hit a kernel bug at
> drivers/pci/msi.c:371. (This didn't occur in v3.)
This is in free_msi_irqs():
368 for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev)
369 if (entry->irq)
370 for (i = 0; i < entry->nvec_used; i++)
371 BUG_ON(irq_has_action(entry->irq + i));
I don't think this is indicating a bug in the PCI core (although I do
think a BUG_ON() here is an excessive response). I think it's an
indication that the driver didn't disconnect its ISR. Without more
details of the failure it's hard to tell if the BUG_ON is a symptom of
a problem in the driver or what.
An "alive" flag feels racy, and I can't tell if it's really the best
way to deal with this, or if it's just avoiding the issue. There must
be other drivers with the same cleanup issue -- do they handle it the
same way?
> To solve this, we've moved the pci release code back into the
> unregister function and reintroduced an alive flag. This time,
> however, the alive flag is protected by mrpc_mutex and we're very
> careful about what happens to devices still in use (they should
> all be released through the timeout path and an ENODEV error
> returned to userspace; while new commands are blocked with the
> same error).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists