[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bed2c2a6-5862-a04b-b9ca-07184718a125@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:05:14 +0900
From: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf annotate: Get correct line numbers matched
with addr
On 03/01/2017 10:17 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Taeung,
>
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:59:51AM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
>> Currently perf-annotate show wrong line numbers.
>>
>> For example,
>> Actual source code is as below
>>
>> ...
>> 21 };
>> 22
>> 23 unsigned int limited_wgt;
>> 24
>> 25 unsigned int get_cond_maxprice(int wgt)
>> 26 {
>> ...
>>
>> However, the output of perf-annotate is as below.
>>
>> 4 Disassembly of section .text:
>>
>> 6 0000000000400966 <get_cond_maxprice>:
>> 7 get_cond_maxprice():
>> 26 };
>>
>> 28 unsigned int limited_wgt;
>>
>> 30 unsigned int get_cond_maxprice(int wgt)
>> 31 {
>>
>> The cause is the wrong way counting line numbers
>> in symbol__parse_objdump_line().
>> So remove wrong current code counting line number and
>> use other method for it using functions related to addr2line
>> instead of the output of '-l' of objdump.
>
> Hmm.. do you think it's a bug of objdump or it's perf failing to parse
> the line number correctly? I'd like to see the output of `objdump -l`
>
Both are ok.
'objdump -l' hasn't a bug related to line number
and perf's method parsing the line number is ok.
But symbol__parse_objdump_line() wrongly count line numbers
after parsing it as below.
1172 /* /filename:linenr ? Save line number and ignore. */
1173 if (regexec(&file_lineno, line, 2, match, 0) == 0) {
1174 *line_nr = atoi(line + match[1].rm_so);
1175 return 0;
1176 }
...
1208 dl = disasm_line__new(offset, parsed_line, privsize,
*line_nr, arch, map);
1209 free(line);
1210 (*line_nr)++;
Increasing line_nr each asm line is wrong method.
Because 'line_nr' means actual source code line number.
Sure, I can fix only the wrong counting way.
But the above parsing method(1172~1176) is never used because of 'grep -v'
in command as below.
(the grep already remove lines containing filename:linenr of output)
1435 snprintf(command, sizeof(command),
1436 "%s %s%s --start-address=0x%016" PRIx64
1437 " --stop-address=0x%016" PRIx64
1438 " -l -d %s %s -C %s 2>/dev/null|grep -v %s|expand",
1439 objdump_path ? objdump_path : "objdump",
1440 disassembler_style ? "-M " : "",
1441 disassembler_style ? disassembler_style : "",
1442 map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start),
1443 map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->end),
1444 symbol_conf.annotate_asm_raw ? "" : "--no-show-raw",
1445 symbol_conf.annotate_src ? "-S" : "",
1446 symfs_filename, symfs_filename);
Therefore, I think it is better to do three things
1) fix the wrong counting line number problem
2) remove unused the line number parsing method
3) In addtion, a bit reduce objdump dependency
using functions related to addr2line of perf.
What do you think about that ?
Is it bad idea ?
>>
>> However, despite the correct line numbers,
>> we can't show proper source code view
>> because of limitations from output of 'objdump -S'.
>>
>> So, next commit will resolve the limitations from 'objdump -S'
>> with the new source code view.
>
> It seems not related with this commit..
>
Okey, will remove the mention.
Thanks,
Taeung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists