linux-kernel - Re: mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269 on xfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170302103520.GC1404@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2017 11:35:20 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:     Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mm allocation failure and hang when running xfstests generic/269
 on xfs

On Thu 02-03-17 19:04:48, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
[...]
> So, commit 5d17a73a2ebeb8d1("vmalloc: back off when the current task is
> killed") implemented __GFP_KILLABLE flag and automatically applied that
> flag. As a result, those who are not ready to fail upon SIGKILL are
> confused. ;-)

You are right! The function is documented it might fail but the code
doesn't really allow that. This seems like a bug to me. What do you
think about the following?
---
>From d02cb0285d8ce3344fd64dc7e2912e9a04bef80d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 11:31:11 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: allow kmem_zalloc_greedy to fail

Even though kmem_zalloc_greedy is documented it might fail the current
code doesn't really implement this properly and loops on the smallest
allowed size for ever. This is a problem because vzalloc might fail
permanently. Since 5d17a73a2ebe ("vmalloc: back off when the current
task is killed") such a failure is much more probable than it used to
be. Fix this by bailing out if the minimum size request failed.

This has been noticed by a hung generic/269 xfstest by Xiong Zhou.

Reported-by: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@...hat.com>
Analyzed-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
 fs/xfs/kmem.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/kmem.c b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
index 339c696bbc01..ee95f5c6db45 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/kmem.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/kmem.c
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ kmem_zalloc_greedy(size_t *size, size_t minsize, size_t maxsize)
 	size_t		kmsize = maxsize;
 
 	while (!(ptr = vzalloc(kmsize))) {
+		if (kmsize == minsize)
+			break;
 		if ((kmsize >>= 1) <= minsize)
 			kmsize = minsize;
 	}
-- 
2.11.0

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs