[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ZNrE4k24gHSqTVL5DdQY8Ogj0oob9pS7NM5xDs1Bd1HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 11:11:06 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: net/dccp: dccp_create_openreq_child freed held lock
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:38:54AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've got the following report while running syzkaller fuzzer on
>> 86292b33d4b79ee03e2f43ea0381ef85f077c760:
>>
>>
>> It seems that dccp_create_openreq_child needs to unlock the sock if
>> dccp_feat_activate_values fails.
>
> Yeah, can you please use the patch below, that mimics the error paths in
> sk_clone_new(), from where I think even the comment about it being a raw
> copy came, but the bh_unlock_sock() didn't?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> diff --git a/net/dccp/minisocks.c b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> index 53eddf99e4f6..d20d948a98ed 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_create_openreq_child(const struct sock *sk,
> /* It is still raw copy of parent, so invalidate
> * destructor and make plain sk_free() */
> newsk->sk_destruct = NULL;
> + bh_unlock_sock(newsk);
> sk_free(newsk);
> return NULL;
> }
Applied the patch on bots. Will report if it happens again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists