[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170302142418.GA16773@singhal-Inspiron-5558>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 19:54:19 +0530
From: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
To: marvin24@....de
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ac100@...ts.launchpad.net,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] staging: nvec: cleanup USLEEP_RANGE checkpatch checks
Resolve strict checkpatch USLEEP_RANGE checks by converting delays and
sleeps as described in ./Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt.
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/
timers/timers-howto.txt
Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
index c1feccf..cd35e64 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
break;
case 2: /* first byte after command */
if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) {
- udelay(33);
+ usleep_range(33, 100);
if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) {
dev_err(nvec->dev,
"Read without prior read command\n");
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
* We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without
* it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated.
*/
- udelay(100);
+ usleep_range(100, 200);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists