linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] KVM: SVM: prepare for new bit definition in nested

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <148846755776.2349.6707914627128907579.stgit@brijesh-build-machine>
Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:12:37 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <brijesh.singh@....com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <rkrcmar@...hat.com>, <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <gary.hook@....com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <cl@...ux.com>,
        <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <bhe@...hat.com>,
        <xemul@...allels.com>, <joro@...tes.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <peterz@...radead.org>, <piotr.luc@...el.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <msalter@...hat.com>, <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>, <bp@...e.de>,
        <dyoung@...hat.com>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>, <jroedel@...e.de>,
        <keescook@...omium.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <toshi.kani@....com>,
        <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
        <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
        <tony.luck@...el.com>, <alexandre.bounine@....com>,
        <kuleshovmail@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mcgrof@...nel.org>, <mst@...hat.com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <tj@...nel.org>,
        <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 03/32] KVM: SVM: prepare for new bit definition in
 nested_ctl

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>

Currently the nested_ctl variable in the vmcb_control_area structure is
used to indicate nested paging support. The nested paging support field
is actually defined as bit 0 of the field. In order to support a new
feature flag the usage of the nested_ctl and nested paging support must
be converted to operate on a single bit.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h |    2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c         |    7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
index 14824fc..2aca535 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/svm.h
@@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_control_area {
 #define SVM_VM_CR_SVM_LOCK_MASK 0x0008ULL
 #define SVM_VM_CR_SVM_DIS_MASK  0x0010ULL
 
+#define SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE	BIT(0)
+
 struct __attribute__ ((__packed__)) vmcb_seg {
 	u16 selector;
 	u16 attrib;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 08a4d3a..75b0645 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static void init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 
 	if (npt_enabled) {
 		/* Setup VMCB for Nested Paging */
-		control->nested_ctl = 1;
+		control->nested_ctl |= SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE;
 		clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_INVLPG);
 		clr_exception_intercept(svm, PF_VECTOR);
 		clr_cr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR3_READ);
@@ -2840,7 +2840,8 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vmcb *vmcb)
 	if (vmcb->control.asid == 0)
 		return false;
 
-	if (vmcb->control.nested_ctl && !npt_enabled)
+	if ((vmcb->control.nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) &&
+	    !npt_enabled)
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
@@ -2915,7 +2916,7 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	else
 		svm->vcpu.arch.hflags &= ~HF_HIF_MASK;
 
-	if (nested_vmcb->control.nested_ctl) {
+	if (nested_vmcb->control.nested_ctl & SVM_NESTED_CTL_NP_ENABLE) {
 		kvm_mmu_unload(&svm->vcpu);
 		svm->nested.nested_cr3 = nested_vmcb->control.nested_cr3;
 		nested_svm_init_mmu_context(&svm->vcpu);