[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170302182625.GB13268@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:26:25 -0500
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Zhigang Lu <zlu@...hip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: set __jump_table alignment to 8
+++ Steven Rostedt [02/03/17 13:11 -0500]:
>
>Can I get an Ack from a module maintainer?
Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Thanks!
Jessica
>On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:04:53 -0800
>David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com> wrote:
>
>> For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
>> causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a module containing a __jump_table.
>>
>> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
>> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in
>> linux-next, which uses the two least significant bits of pointers to
>> __jump_table elements.
>>
>> Fix by forcing __jump_table to 8, which is the same alignment used for
>> this section in the kernel proper.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> scripts/module-common.lds | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/module-common.lds b/scripts/module-common.lds
>> index 73a2c7d..53234e8 100644
>> --- a/scripts/module-common.lds
>> +++ b/scripts/module-common.lds
>> @@ -19,4 +19,6 @@ SECTIONS {
>>
>> . = ALIGN(8);
>> .init_array 0 : { *(SORT(.init_array.*)) *(.init_array) }
>> +
>> + __jump_table 0 : ALIGN(8) { KEEP(*(__jump_table)) }
>> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists