[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170302185518.GA1030@jaegeuk.local>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:55:18 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: correct cp_ver for compatibility to old image
On 03/02, Chao Yu wrote:
> There is no CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG tagged in checkpoint pack, calculate
> cp_version as old format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 6c027b6833f4..0d46404ca769 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -2507,7 +2507,9 @@ static int __get_nat_bitmaps(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> }
>
> - cp_ver |= (cur_cp_crc(ckpt) << 32);
> + if (__is_set_ckpt_flags(ckpt, CP_CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG))
> + cp_ver |= (cur_cp_crc(ckpt) << 32);
Well, we always write nat_bits with crc. So if it's different, something is
wrong and we need to drop it. CP-CRC_RECOVERY_FLAG is used for roll-forward
recovery, which is a different context.
> +
> if (cpu_to_le64(cp_ver) != *(__le64 *)nm_i->nat_bits) {
> disable_nat_bits(sbi, true);
> return 0;
> --
> 2.8.2.295.g3f1c1d0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists