[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36617bf1-acae-95ef-2917-9facb39e30f5@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:49:35 -0500
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: Fix anonymous union initialization
On 03/02/2017 04:42 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017 16:07:19 -0500
> Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/28/2017 11:32 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Pre-4.6 gcc do not allow direct static initialization of members of
>>> anonymous structs/unions. After commit 3821fd35b58d ("jump_label:
>>> Reduce the size of struct static_key") STATIC_KEY_INIT_{TRUE|FALSE}
>>> definitions cannot be compiled with those older compilers.
>>>
>>> Placing initializers inside curved brackets works around this problem.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/linux/jump_label.h | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/jump_label.h b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>>> index 8e06d75..518020b 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/jump_label.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/jump_label.h
>>> @@ -166,10 +166,10 @@ extern void arch_jump_label_transform_static(struct jump_entry *entry,
>>> */
>>> #define STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE \
>>> { .enabled = { 1 }, \
>>> - .entries = (void *)JUMP_TYPE_TRUE }
>>> + { .entries = (void *)JUMP_TYPE_TRUE } }
>>> #define STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE \
>>> { .enabled = { 0 }, \
>>> - .entries = (void *)JUMP_TYPE_FALSE }
>>> + { .entries = (void *)JUMP_TYPE_FALSE } }
>>>
>>> #else /* !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL */
>>>
>>>
>>
>> (Adding Steve to 'cc)
>>
>> Thanks for the fix.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
>
> Funny, Chris pinged me on IRC telling me that jump labels broke with my
> latest tree. And we discovered it was because of anonymous unions and
> he was using an older compiler (4.4 or something). I didn't know how to
> make it work, and we were just going to say "tough, jump labels are not
> for 4.4". Although, didn't goto asm get added into 4.5? Did someone
> backport it to the gcc 4.4 compilers? I believe 4.5 handles anonymous
> unions.
>
> Since the broken commit went through my tree, I'll take this patch.
> I'm getting ready for another git pull request to Linus.
>
Compiled-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists