[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7369636.07Z93mMh8K@agathebauer>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:42:00 +0100
From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] perf report: Show inline stack
On Dienstag, 21. Februar 2017 01:28:17 CET Jin, Yao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any comments for this patch series?
Sorry for the delay. I just tested it again.
Overall, this is a clear improvement, so I'm all for getting this
functionality in.
But from a usability point of view, I still have the some of the issues that I
have raised in the past:
a) --inline should be a boolean setting that enables inline resolution on
demand
b) the other callgraph settings and formatting should be used for inlined
frames, i.e.
- instead of `perf report --inline-name`
it should be: `perf report --inline -g function`
and since `-g function` is the default, it would be the same as:
`perf report --inline`
- instead of `perf report --inline-line -g address`
it should be: `perf report --inline -g address`
Again: As a user of `perf report`, I do not care whether a frame is an inlined
one or a non-inlined one - both should be grouped and displayed the same way.
I.e. this is unusable (imo):
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
perf report --inline-line --stdio
99.81% 35.99% cpp-inlining cpp-inlining [.] main
|
|--63.82%--main
|
---/home/milian/projects/kdab/rnd/hotspot/tests/test-
clients/cpp-inlining/main.cpp:39 (inline)
/usr/include/c++/6.3.1/complex:664 (inline)
| |
| |--63.19%--hypot
| | |
| | --58.04%--__hypot_finite
| |
| --0.62%--cabs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dito for this:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
perf report --stdio --inline-name -g address --stdio
99.81% 35.99% cpp-inlining cpp-inlining [.] main
|
|--63.82%--main complex:655
|
---main (inline)
std::norm<double> (inline)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
But, again, even with these gripes, I think it's a very useful feature and I
would like to see it integrated upstream. From my POV, you can add
Tested-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
to all patches in this series.
Many thanks!
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@...b.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5903 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists