linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fixes related to the passive mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1573986.gdsgdO0VUn@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Thu, 02 Mar 2017 23:20:20 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fixes related to the passive mode

Hi,

This series fixes some passive mode behavior related to limits and the
cpu_frequency tracepoint.

It depends on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9594447/ (which is in
linux-next already), but it doesn't depend on the other series I posted
yesterday (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9597147/ ,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9597145/,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9597137/).

All three patches in this series are reasonably straightforward and should
not be controversial.  Also they should affect the passive mode only.

Thanks,
Rafael