[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15929d7a-65e5-f8ba-2fac-0381c5f8e8fc@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:53:35 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, khilman@...libre.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
skannan@...eaurora.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
andy.gross@...aro.org, seansw@....qualcomm.com,
davidai@...cinc.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 1/2] interconnect: Add generic interconnect controller
API
On 03/01/17 10:22, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..103524b59905
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +menuconfig INTERCONNECT
> + bool "On-Chip Interconnect management support"
Why isn't this symbol tristate instead of bool so that the
interconnect management support can be built as a loadable module?
> + help
> + Support for management of the on-chip interconnects.
> +
> + This framework is designed to provide a generic interface for
> + managing the interconnects in a SoC.
> +
> + If unsure, say no.
> +
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists