linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v0 1/2] interconnect: Add generic interconnect controller API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:53:35 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        mturquette@...libre.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, seansw@....qualcomm.com,
        davidai@...cinc.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v0 1/2] interconnect: Add generic interconnect controller
 API

On 03/01/17 10:22, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..103524b59905
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +menuconfig INTERCONNECT
> +	bool "On-Chip Interconnect management support"

Why isn't this symbol tristate instead of bool so that the
interconnect management support can be built as a loadable module?


> +	help
> +	  Support for management of the on-chip interconnects.
> +
> +	  This framework is designed to provide a generic interface for
> +          managing the interconnects in a SoC.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say no.
> +


-- 
~Randy