[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxicm-9s4WNA4s0htXiPWAKYgubcpooWNahMC1paZ=Gn0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:12:40 +0200
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vfs patches for 4.11
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:32:08AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 05:19:00PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> >> Hi Al,
>> >>
>> >> Please pull from:
>> >>
>> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git for-viro
>> >>
>> >> Amir Goldstein (4):
>> >> vfs: create vfs helper vfs_tmpfile()
>> >> vfs: deny fallocate() on directory
>> >> vfs: deny copy_file_range() for non regular files
>> >> vfs: wrap write f_ops with file_{start,end}_write()
>> >
>> > The last one could have a better summary, but anyway - pulled.
>>
>> Al,
>>
>> Please excuse my impatience, but do you plan to send these out to
>> Linus for 4.11?
>
> Yes. As the matter of fact, it will be one of the pull requests in today's
> pile.
Cool.
Miklos,
This vfs pile was already pulled.
Could you please follow up with overlayfs 4.11 pull request.
I also verified that overlayfs-next and rebased-statx have no conflicts
(copy_up.c is correctly auto-merged)
and re-tested concurrent copy up and -g overlay/quick with the test merge.
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists