linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2017 10:35:55 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, juri.lelli@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        xlpang@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com, dvhart@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 00/10] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:05:22AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:02:44PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > OK, so after having not thought about this, and then spend the last two
> > > days trying to cram all this nonsense back into my head, I think I have
> > > a slightly simpler option.
> > > 
> > > In any case, I'll go respin the patch-set and repost.
> > 
> > That is; what is wrong with the below patch against mainline?
> 
> After staring at it for a couple of hours and paging the futex horror back
> in, I don't see any problem with that.

Awesome, that makes things simpler. Let me go respin the patches.