[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170303080419.GA31582@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 09:04:20 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vbabka.lkml@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lockdep: Teach lockdep about memalloc_noio_save
On Wed 01-03-17 17:18:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 01-03-17 17:12:20, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:05:30PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Anyway, does the following help?
> >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > > index 47e4f82380e4..d5386ad7ed3f 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
> > > #include <linux/random.h>
> > > #include <linux/jhash.h>
> > > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> >
> > No, Ingo moved that to linux/sched/mm.h in tip/master, which was the
> > problem.
>
> Yeah, have seen your email after I posted mine...
>
> > But I think this needs to go to Linus in this cycle, right? In which
> > case Ingo gets to sort the fallout.
>
> Yes I think it would be better to send it sonner rahter than later.
> People also might want to backport it to older kernels...
Would you mind if I took this patch and route it via Andrew? I plan to
resubmit my scope NOFS patchset [1] and [2] will need to be refreshed on
top of it so it would be easier for me that way.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170206140718.16222-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170206140718.16222-4-mhocko@kernel.org
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists