lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2017 14:29:53 +0530
From:   Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     ast@...com, peterz@...radead.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        daniel@...earbox.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        ebiederm@...ssion.com, sargun@...gun.me,
        Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        brendan.d.gregg@...il.com, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] perf tool: add cgroup identifier entry in perf
 report



On Thursday 02 March 2017 02:46 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 07:33:13PM +0530, Hari Bathini escreveu:
>> This patch introduces a cgroup identifier entry field in perf report to
>> identify or distinguish data of different cgroups. It uses the device
>> number and inode number of cgroup namespace, included in perf data with
>> the new PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES event, as cgroup identifier. With the
>> assumption that each container is created with it's own cgroup namespace,
>> this allows assessment/analysis of multiple containers at once.
> Could you try to do this with some real world example? I.e. telling that
> systemd creates some cgroups and then how to map the perf report output
> you show below with what systemd puts in place.
>
> Doing it with docker would be handy as well, no?

Cgroup namespace is a relatively new thing in the kernel (v4.9).
So, I am not sure if there is a real world example for this yet.
A simple test in the meanwhile would be to clone() multiple
processes by passing CLONE_NEWCROUP & SIGCHLD flags to each
process, executing a shell and running different workloads
on each of them while tracing.

> You also forgot to update the documentation with this new sort key,
> please add it in the --sort part of
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-report.txt.

Sure. Will update.

> Ah, and just another minor request: please format the changeset
> summaries as:
>
>   perf tools: Add cgroup identifier sort order keyword
>
>
> First the component, that in this case is the generic one, as it affects
> multiple tools (top, report), and then start with a capital letter after
> the colon.
>

Sorry. I will take of this in next spin.

Thanks
Hari

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ