[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:58:36 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Janusz Uzycki <j.uzycki@...roma.com.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tty/serial: sh-sci: remove uneeded IS_ERR_OR_NULL calls
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com> wrote:
> Since commit 1d267ea6539f ("serial: mctrl-gpio: simplify init routine"),
> the mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod() function can't return an error anymore.
> So, just testing for a NULL pointer is ok.
If CONFIG_GPIOLIB=n, mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod() always returns ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS).
That case should be handled correctly, too.
Perhaps mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod() should always return NULL if !CONFIG_GPIOLIB?
This may apply to the other 2 patches, too:
[PATCH 2/4] tty/serial: atmel: remove uneeded IS_ERR_OR_NULL calls
[PATCH 3/4] tty/serial: mxs-auart: remove uneeded IS_ERR_OR_NULL calls
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> index 9a47cc4f16a2..36fde6f24040 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
> @@ -1934,12 +1934,12 @@ static unsigned int sci_get_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
> if (s->autorts) {
> if (sci_get_cts(port))
> mctrl |= TIOCM_CTS;
> - } else if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_CTS))) {
> + } else if (!mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_CTS)) {
> mctrl |= TIOCM_CTS;
> }
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_DSR)))
> + if (!mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_DSR))
> mctrl |= TIOCM_DSR;
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_DCD)))
> + if (!mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(gpios, UART_GPIO_DCD))
> mctrl |= TIOCM_CAR;
>
> return mctrl;
> @@ -3072,10 +3072,8 @@ static int sci_probe_single(struct platform_device *dev,
> return PTR_ERR(sciport->gpios);
>
> if (sciport->has_rtscts) {
> - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(sciport->gpios,
> - UART_GPIO_CTS)) ||
> - !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(sciport->gpios,
> - UART_GPIO_RTS))) {
> + if (mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(sciport->gpios, UART_GPIO_CTS) ||
> + mctrl_gpio_to_gpiod(sciport->gpios, UART_GPIO_RTS)) {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Conflicting RTS/CTS config\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists