Message-ID: <20170303223649.GH13877@fieldses.org>
Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2017 17:36:49 -0500
From:   bfields@...ldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/30] fs: new API for handling i_version

The patch ordering is a little annoying as I'd like to be able to be
able to verify the implementation at the same time these new interfaces
are added, but, I don't know, I don't have a better idea.

Anyway, various nits:

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:03:28PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We already have inode_inc_iversion. Add inode_set_iversion,
> inode_get_iversion, inode_cmp_iversion and inode_iversion_need_inc.
> 
> These should encompass how i_version is currently accessed and
> manipulated so that we can later change the implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/fs.h | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 2ba074328894..075c915fe2b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1962,18 +1962,117 @@ static inline void inode_dec_link_count(struct inode *inode)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * inode_set_iversion - set i_version to a particular value
> + * @inode: inode to set
> + * @new: new i_version value to set
> + *
> + * Set the inode's i_version. Should generally be called when initializing
> + * a new inode.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +inode_set_iversion(struct inode *inode, const u64 new)
> +{
> +	inode->i_version = new;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_inc_iversion_locked - increment i_version while protected
> + * @inode: inode to be updated
> + *
> + * Increment the i_version field in the inode. This version is usable
> + * when there is some other sort of lock in play that would prevent
> + * concurrent accessors.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +inode_inc_iversion_locked(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	inode->i_version++;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_set_iversion_read - set i_version to a particular value and flag
> + * 			     set flag to indicate that it has been viewed

s/flag set flag/set flag/.

> + * @inode: inode to set
> + * @new: new i_version value to set
> + *
> + * Set the inode's i_version, and flag the inode as if it has been viewed.
> + * Should generally be called when initializinga new inode in memory from
> + * from disk.

s/from from/from/.

> + */
> +static inline void
> +inode_set_iversion_read(struct inode *inode, const u64 new)
> +{
> +	inode_set_iversion(inode, new);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * inode_inc_iversion - increments i_version
>   * @inode: inode that need to be updated
>   *
>   * Every time the inode is modified, the i_version field will be incremented.
> - * The filesystem has to be mounted with i_version flag
> + * The filesystem has to be mounted with MS_I_VERSION flag.

I'm not sure why that comment's there.  Filesystems can choose to
increment i_version without requiring the mount option if they want,
can't they?

> + */
> +static inline bool

Document what the return value means?

> +inode_inc_iversion(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	inode_inc_iversion_locked(inode);
> +	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_get_iversion_raw - read i_version without "perturbing" it
> + * @inode: inode from which i_version should be read
> + *
> + * Read the inode i_version counter for an inode without registering it as a
> + * read. Should typically be used by local filesystems that need to store an
> + * i_version on disk.
> + */
> +static inline u64
> +inode_get_iversion_raw(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return inode->i_version;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_get_iversion - read i_version for later use
> + * @inode: inode from which i_version should be read
> + *
> + * Read the inode i_version counter. This should be used by callers that wish
> + * to store the returned i_version for later comparison.

I'm not sure what "for later comparison" means.  This is the "read"
operation that actually flags the i_version as read, which you'd use
(for example) to implement NFS getattr?  I wonder if there's a better
way to say that.

> + */
> +static inline u64
> +inode_get_iversion(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +	return inode_get_iversion_raw(inode);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * inode_cmp_iversion - check whether the i_version counter has changed
> + * @inode: inode to check
> + * @old: old value to check against its i_version
> + *
> + * Compare an i_version counter with a previous one. Returns 0 if they are
> + * the same or non-zero if they are different.

Does this flag the i_version as read?  What's it for?  (OK, I guess I'll
find out after a few more patches...).

--b.

>   */
> +static inline s64
> +inode_cmp_iversion(const struct inode *inode, const u64 old)
> +{
> +	return (s64)inode->i_version - (s64)old;
> +}
>  
> -static inline void inode_inc_iversion(struct inode *inode)
> +/**
> + * inode_iversion_need_inc - is the i_version in need of being incremented?
> + * @inode: inode to check
> + *
> + * Returns whether the inode->i_version counter needs incrementing on the next
> + * change.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +inode_iversion_need_inc(struct inode *inode)
>  {
> -       spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -       inode->i_version++;
> -       spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  enum file_time_flags {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists