[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170304130550.GT21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 13:05:50 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] futex: remove duplicated code
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 01:27:10PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> index 6795368ad023..cc414382dab4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -128,20 +128,10 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
> #endif /* !SMP */
>
> static inline int
> -futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr)
> {
> - int op = (encoded_op >> 28) & 7;
> - int cmp = (encoded_op >> 24) & 15;
> - int oparg = (encoded_op << 8) >> 20;
> - int cmparg = (encoded_op << 20) >> 20;
> int oldval = 0, ret, tmp;
>
> - if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28))
> - oparg = 1 << oparg;
> -
> - if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> preempt_disable();
> #endif
> @@ -172,17 +162,9 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> preempt_enable();
> #endif
>
> - if (!ret) {
> - switch (cmp) {
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ: ret = (oldval == cmparg); break;
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE: ret = (oldval != cmparg); break;
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LT: ret = (oldval < cmparg); break;
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GE: ret = (oldval >= cmparg); break;
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LE: ret = (oldval <= cmparg); break;
> - case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT: ret = (oldval > cmparg); break;
> - default: ret = -ENOSYS;
> - }
> - }
> + if (!ret)
> + *oval = oldval;
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index b687cb22301c..c5ff9850952f 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1457,6 +1457,42 @@ futex_wake(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, int nr_wake, u32 bitset)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int futex_atomic_op_inuser(int encoded_op, u32 __user *uaddr)
> +{
> + int op = (encoded_op >> 28) & 7;
> + int cmp = (encoded_op >> 24) & 15;
> + int oparg = (encoded_op << 8) >> 20;
> + int cmparg = (encoded_op << 20) >> 20;
Hmm. oparg and cmparg look like they're doing these shifts to get sign
extension of the 12-bit values by assuming that "int" is 32-bit -
probably worth a comment, or for safety, they should be "s32" so it's
not dependent on the bit-width of "int".
> + int oldval, ret;
> +
> + if (encoded_op & (FUTEX_OP_OPARG_SHIFT << 28))
> + oparg = 1 << oparg;
I guess it doesn't matter that oparg can be >= the bit size of oparg
(so large values produce an undefined result) as it's no different
from userspace trying to do the same with large shifts.
> +
> + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + ret = arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(op, oparg, &oldval, uaddr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + switch (cmp) {
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_EQ:
> + return oldval == cmparg;
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_NE:
> + return oldval != cmparg;
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LT:
> + return oldval < cmparg;
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GE:
> + return oldval >= cmparg;
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_LE:
> + return oldval <= cmparg;
> + case FUTEX_OP_CMP_GT:
> + return oldval > cmparg;
> + default:
> + return -ENOSYS;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Wake up all waiters hashed on the physical page that is mapped
> * to this virtual address:
As it's no worse than our existing code, for the above,
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists